نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 استاد روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
3 استاد روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
4 استاد حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Objective: This article examines how human transformation is conceived in Mullā Ṣadrā’s theory of substantial motion and in Carl Rogers’s phenomenal psychology, asking at what explanatory level each answers the question of how a person changes. Method: The study is qualitative, conceptual, and text-based. After reconstructing both systems from their principal works and reliable secondary literature, seven axes (subject and depth, graded form, inward source, awareness, blockage, agency, and horizon) were compared by the role each concept plays in answering a shared question, without presupposing conceptual equivalence. Findings: Both traditions treat transformation as graded and inwardly directed and attribute failure to change to inner blockage; yet “depth” refers to the soul’s mode of being in Ṣadrā and to the organization of experience and self in Rogers. Moreover, the two traditions diverge in level or horizon on agency and on the end of transformation. Originality: The study distinguishes two levels of response and identifies where similarities are merely lexical. Conclusion: The relation is neither identity nor absolute incommensurability; distinguishing psychological, ethical, and existential levels is essential in counseling.
کلیدواژه‌ها English
