نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
2 استاد گروه مشاوره دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر تدوین و اعتباریابی بستۀ روانی- آموزشی مهارتهای زناشویی بر مبنای التقاطنگری بهمنظور بهبود کنترلگری زناشویی و الگوهای ارتباطی همسران متعارض بود. روش تحقیق از نوع آمیخته بود که بخش کیفی بهروش دلفی و بخش کمی یک مطالعۀ نیمهآزمایشی با طرح پیشآزمون- پسآزمون همراه با گروه کنترل و مرحلۀ پیگیری دوماهه بود. جامعۀ پژوهش بخش کیفی کلیۀ متخصصان خبره در زمینۀ مشاورۀ ازدواج و خانواده بود که 30 نفر بهروش نمونهگیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. در بخش کمی نیز کلیۀ زوجهای مراجعهکننده به مراکز مشاورۀ زنجان بود که 50 زوج که نمراتشان در پرسشنامۀ رفتارهای کنترلگرایانۀ کوان و آرچر (2003) و پرسشنامۀ الگوهای ارتباطی کریستنسن و سالاوی (1984) بالا بود بهصورت نمونهگیری در دسترس انتخاب و در دو گروه 25 نفرۀ آزمایش و کنترل بهصورت تصادفی جایگزین شدند. گروه آزمایش طی نه جلسۀ دوساعته تحت آموزش بر اساس پروتکل بستۀ تدوینشده قرار گرفت؛ در حالیکه گروه کنترل هیچ آموزشی دریافت نکرد. در بخش کیفی دادهها با استفاده از ضریب توافق کندال و در بخش کمی با آزمون کوواریانس تحلیل شدند. روایی محتوایی بسته مطلوب بود و پانل تخصصی در دور چهارم دلفی به توافق نهایی و قوی رسیدند. در بخش کمی نیز یافتهها حاکی از آن بود که بستۀ تدوینشده توانسته کنترلگری زناشویی و الگوهای ارتباطی زوجهای متعارض گروه آزمایش را در مقایسه با گروه کنترل بهبود بخشد (05/0>p) که این تفاوت در مرحلۀ پیگیری نیز معنیدار بود. نتایج حاکی از آن است که بستۀ تدوینشده میتواند در بهبود کنترلگری زناشویی و الگوهای ارتباطی همسران متعارض اثربخش واقع شود.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Developing a psycho- educational package of marital skills based on eclecticism approach and determining its effectiveness on improving marital controlling and communication patterns in conflicting couples
نویسندگان [English]
- Rahim Rabet 1
- Ali Rezaeisharif 2
- Hossein Qamari kivi 2
1 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh, Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Extended Abstract:
Introduction
Marriage is a fundamental institution that shapes societies and individuals (Harsono et al., 2024). A harmonious family is one in which there is intimacy between couples with effective communication patterns and minimum conflict (Musthof & Lutfia, 2024). However, recently, worrying trends have been reported in the field of marriage and the tendency to divorce; the divorce rate is increasing in most countries (Aami BandehGharaei, 2023; Sbara & Coan, 2017), which has also affected Iranian society in this regard (Khani, 2023; Jafari et al., 2021). Iran ranks fourth in the world in terms of divorce (Sarfarazi & Sadattabatabayi, 2023); therefore, interventions and training programs for couples in the field of marital skills seem necessary. Research has identified several problems for conflicting spouses, including controlling behaviors and deficits in communication patterns in couples (Salimi et al., 2024). Marital control is a variety of non-physical abusive behaviors used to control a partner (Lohmann et al., 2024). Given that controlling spouses lack effective communication skills, lack empathy skills, and have unconstructive communications (Xyrakis et al., 2024; Modirzare et al., 2021), this characteristic of spouses is linked to another variable called communication patterns. Communication patterns are the ways in which information, thoughts, and feelings are transmitted to and ultimately returned to both parties in a relationship (Zhang et al., 2024).
Experts attribute this critical situation partly to factors such as the lack of couples equipped with marital skills (Modirzare et al., 2021; Xyrakis et al., 2024). When such skills are taught to couples, it is referred to as marital enrichment programs. Research suggests that combining therapeutic approaches (i.e., eclecticism) is more effective (Wedding & Corsini, 2019).
By developing a marital skills enrichment package based on eclecticism, the present study presents various skills and interventions for conflicting couples. On the other hand, it aims to answer the question of whether the developed package is effective in improving marital control and communication patterns of conflicting spouses.
Literature Review
Controlling behavior was introduced in 2005 by Graham-Kevan and Archer (Başkan & Alkan, 2023). Concrete examples include one spouse trying to prevent the partner from meeting friends, restricting travel to and from the parents' house, insisting on knowing where his or her partner is at all times, determining what type of clothing his or her wife should wear, asking his or her permission before doing anything, being extremely pessimistic about his or her partner's infidelity (Aizpuru et al., 2021). A spouse's interference in their partner's use of cyberspace and social networks, and constant checking of text messages, contacts, and conversations on their mobile phone are also considered new indicators of marital controlling (Belotti et al., 2022).
A variety of communication patterns are displayed by spouses, ranging from constructive dialogue to uncompromising behavior (Omoboye et al., 2024). Spouses' awareness of different types of communication patterns can help them improve their married life and reduce marital tensions and conflicts (Wang, 2021). Theorists in the field of marital communication have identified many communication patterns, among which Christensen and Schenk (1991; as cited by Abdi Zarin & Sanei Taheri, 2010) divided communication patterns into three categories: 1. mutual constructive pattern, 2. mutual avoidance pattern, and 3. demand-withdraw pattern. Constructive and effective communication patterns are so important that some researchers believe that the ability of spouses to communicate effectively plays a vital role in marital adjustment and reducing marital conflicts (Krok et al., 2023).
Methodology
The present study was a developmental research in terms of objective and a mixed-methods study in terms of data collection method. In the qualitative part, the Delphi method was used for validation. The research design in the quantitative part is a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test–post-test design with a control group and a two-month follow-up phase. The statistical population of the Delphi section included all Iranian specialists in the fields of marriage, family, and couple counseling. Among them, 30 individuals were selected through purposive sampling method to be part of the Delphi expert panel. In the quantitative section, all couples referred to counseling centers in Zanjan comprised the statistical population of the present study, from which 50 couples, whose scores on the Graham-Kevan and Archer Controlling Behaviors Questionnaire (2005) and the Christensen and Salavi Communication Patterns Questionnaire (1984) were high, were selected through convenience sampling. They were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups (25 couples in each group). The experimental group received training based on the developed protocol for eight two-hour sessions, while the control group received no training. After completing the training sessions, both groups were evaluated by a posttest. The experimental group was re-evaluated after a two-month follow-up period. Data were analyzed using Kendall’s coefficient of agreement (W), univariate analysis of covariance, and the Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS.
Results
In this qualitative research (Delphi method), the number of participants in the expert panel was 30; this panel reached a strong consensus in the fourth round. (see Table 1). The Delphi method used in this research consisted of four rounds. In the first round, based on the developed package, expert panel members extracted indicators. After collecting, organizing, classifying, analyzing, and reviewing the opinions, 36 indicators were finally developed.
Table 1. Comparison of Central Tendencies and Kendall’s Correlation Coefficient (W) in Three Delphi Stages
Round
Mod
Median
Mean
Standard Deviation
Kendall Value (W)
Significance Level
2nd
3
3
3.44
.77
.496
.000
3rd
4
4
4.09
.57
.856
.000
4th
6
5
4.74
.43
.894
.000
Descriptive indicators of marital control and communication patterns are included in Table 2.
Table 2. Descriptive Indicators of the Marital Control Variable and Communication Patterns
Variable
Experimental Group
Control Group
Pretest
Posttest
Follow- up
Pretest
Posttest
Follow- up
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
Marital Controlling
93.20
4.76
22.48
5.49
21.64
4.87
97.56
4.10
98.56
3.49
101.48
3.58
mutual Constructive pattern
-25.36
4.36
17.96
2.24
17.08
1.36
-25.32
3.24
-24.52
3.29
-24.04
2.89
mutual avoidance pattern
23.48
2.06
8.52
1.96
8.48
1.61
24.84
1.14
23.96
1.40
23.56
1.39
demand-withdraw pattern
32.56
3.55
8.56
1.53
8.24
1.36
31.52
2.74
30.76
2.47
30.60
2.27
Table 2 shows the descriptive indicators for the two groups across the three stages. As shown, the mean scores for marital controlling decreased sharply for the experimental group after the intervention and were maintained at follow-up, while the control group's scores remained high or increased slightly. Similarly, the communication pattern scores improved for the experimental group and were sustained at follow-up.
Regarding the variable of communication patterns, it can be said that the mutual constructive communication pattern in the experimental group improved compared to the control group and remained stable during the two-month follow-up. The experimental group's mutual avoidance communication pattern decreased and remained stable after two months. Finally, regarding the demand-withdraw pattern, it is important to note that the average scores of both groups were high when participating in training sessions, and this communication pattern also decreased after applying the experimental variable in the experimental group and remained stable after two months; while there was no decrease for the control group.
The results of the analysis of covariance showed that, after controlling for the pretest effect, there was a significant difference between the couples in the experimental and control groups in terms of marital control (p < 0.05, F = 2977.440), mutual constructive pattern (p < 0.05, F =74.851), mutual avoidance pattern (p < 0.05, F =11.167), and demand-withdraw pattern (p < 0.05, F =1545.799). These results indicate that the developed training package has been able to improve the marital controlling of couples in the experimental group, increase their mutually constructive communication pattern, and reduce their mutual avoidance and demand-withdraw communication patterns.
Conclusion
The present study aimed to develop and validate a marital skills package based on an eclectic approach to reduce marital controlling behaviors and improve communication patterns for couples experiencing conflict. The results of the qualitative study indicated that the present educational package possesses good content validity, and the expert panel reached a strong level of agreement in this regard. This finding is consistent with the findings of studies that have shown that enrichment and treatment packages based on an eclectic approach have high validity and effectiveness (Amirbeik et al., 2021; Beyrami & Azhideh, 2025; Jalalvand et al., 2023; Kavehei Sedeh et al., 2022; Mehrjou & Fatehizadeh, 2023; Mostajeran et al., 2021; Namdarppour et al., 2023; Pirsaghi, 2024; Tashakori & Sedrpoushan, 2023).
In the quantitative part, the effectiveness of the package developed as a nine-session training on marital control and communication patterns was examined. The data analysis showed that the marital skills package based on eclecticism could reduce the level of marital control of conflicting couples in the experimental group compared to the control group; it transformed their unconstructive communication patterns into constructive communication patterns. The findings of this study are consistent with those of studies that have examined the approaches of strategic model, intergenerational theory, structural family therapy, schema therapy, McMaster Family Function Model, Gottman Couple Therapy and Satir Approach on improving marital control and communication patterns of conflicting spouses and have been confirmed (Modirzare et al., 2021; Aalami et al., 2019; Asghari Ganji & Tabaripour, 2023; Deylami et al., 2021; Genç, 2021; Omidi et al., 2022; Rahespar et al., 2022; Salehi et al., 2024; Saniei, 2021; Kiadarbandsari et al., 2022).
Acknowledgments
The researchers would like to appreciate all participants for participating in the study.
Keywords: Eclecticism, Communication Patterns, Delphi Method, Marital Controlling, Marital Skills, Validation of Psycho-Educational Package.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- eclecticism
- communication patterns
- Delphi method
- marital control
- Validation
Ziegenhain, U., & Fegert, J (2022). "Prevalence and Predictors of
Affirmations of Intimate Partner Violence in Germany: A First Nationwide Study on Victimization in Women and Men". Journal of interpersonal violence, 08862605221092066.