a e; m kh
Abstract
Introduction: Job stress is one of the biggest threats to the mental health of worker at industrial- organizational psychology viewpoint. This is a major concern of human resource managers in organizations so that special attention has been focused on the issue of work-family conflict. Based on previous ...
Read More
Introduction: Job stress is one of the biggest threats to the mental health of worker at industrial- organizational psychology viewpoint. This is a major concern of human resource managers in organizations so that special attention has been focused on the issue of work-family conflict. Based on previous studies, work-family conflict is one of the most important factors causing stress. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship among work-family conflict, job stress and psychological capital in the Research Institute of Petroleum Industry. Methodology: this study is applied research and the method of data collection is descriptive and correlational based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The study population is RIPI worker and to collect the data, work-family conflict Carlson et al (2000), psychological capital Lathan’s (2007) and job stress Hlrygl and Aslvkam (1996) is used. Collected data using SPSS 20 and PLS software were analyzed. Results: The results showed that the model is a good fit with the data of this study. The relationship between work-family conflict and stress is significant and psychological capital in this regard moderated role plays. Conclusion: The presence of work-family conflict on employees caused by job stress, Considering the role of psychological capital moderated in this regard, it can promote capital in the organization to reduce job stress and health promotion achieved.
zahra tabatabaie jabali; ali delavar; ahmad borjali
Volume 5, Issue 19 , October 2014, , Pages 124-140
Abstract
In recent decades, many studies have examined the relationship between job stress and personality variables. But the results are not consistent and sometimes different results have been reported. Meta-analysis is a systematic technique to solve different resultsin the findings studies about the same ...
Read More
In recent decades, many studies have examined the relationship between job stress and personality variables. But the results are not consistent and sometimes different results have been reported. Meta-analysis is a systematic technique to solve different resultsin the findings studies about the same topic.Accordingly, the aim of the present research was a meta-analysis of the association between job stress and personality variables. Data collected from 106 studies conducted from 1993-2013 and was analyzed then the effect sizes were computed.Findings revealed that the combined effect size for fixed model was 0. 23 and for random model was 0. 24, which both were small effect sizes) Cohen, 1988). Further meta-analysis showed that the Positive affect, anxiety, burnout, perfectionism, time management, hardiness, resiliency, assertiveness variables had significant large positive effects size on job stress. We checked for Publication bias and heterogeneity of effects. The results showed no bias but due to heterogeneity of effects, demographic and methodological variables were examined . Findings revealed that sampling, kind of job, kind of studies and Measuring tools could moderate the relationship between job stress and personality variables as the moderator effects. The overall results suggested that personality variables that emphases on self-understanding have more impact in reducing job stress. Therefore, a further study in this area is needed.
